I must apologise for my lack of output over the last few months. The harsh realities of the current situation affect us all and none of them in a good way. As I write this at the tail end of July 2026, once again Spain is in flames. In Almeria alone, 3800 hectares have been destroyed and that number is still rising as the flames continue to spread. The current tally for all of Spain so far this year is 250,000 hectares. And, once again, all of them were deliberately started, but of course, the arsonists have not been caught and, once again, all of the affected sites have already been sold to faceless corporations for either more officially approved solar farms or data centres.
● Introduction
● History Repeating itself ‑ Land Clearance and Refugees
● The Destruction of The Internet
● “If you’ve got nothing to hide, then you have nothing to worry about.”
● False Accusations
● Artificially Incompetent Nostalgia
● The 20th Century’s Man‑Made Cataclysm
● Keeping it in the Family
● Dominion and Domination through Privilege
● The Sovereign Choice
● The Fisher King Syndrome
● “Let’s Jump the Broomstick"
● Commercial Sovereignty and its Lawful Plunder
● Piracy ‑ No Need to Get Your Feet Wet These Days
● Financial Plunder, Lies, Deceit and Betrayal
● Culture Vultures
● Commercial Kingdoms
● Core Quaker Beliefs.
● Community Spirited Away
● Spot the Sovereignty
● The Web of Wyrd
● Interconnectivityness
● The Evaporation of Community Spirit
● Colonisation and Hereditary Racism
● Stewardship and Respect
● In the Pipeline ...not the Nose Pipeline
This is more history repeating itself. Between 1750 and 1860, a similar situation occurred in Britain, which particularly affected the Scottish Highlands and Islands. The landowners realised that it was much more profitable to raise sheep or pursue other more profitable uses for their land, than to lease it to tenant farmers. The enclosure of common land became common practise right across the British Isles and created large-scale pastoral farms that provided much higher rental income for the landowners. This led to significant rural depopulation and in Scotland it sparked the destruction of their traditional clan society.
“The eviction of tenants went against dùthchas, the principle that clan members had an inalienable right to rent land in the clan territory. This was never recognised in Scottish law. It was gradually abandoned by clan chiefs as they began to think of themselves simply as commercial landlords, rather than as patriarchs of their people—a process that arguably started with the Statutes of Iona of 1609.” (Source)
You could say that the clan members had a Sovereign right to rent the land belonging to the clan. But of course, this counted for nothing in the eyes of the law and the ruling class. Many people were simply evicted from their homes, in some cases they were given half an hour’s notice before their houses and their belongings were burnt to the ground and their animals killed. There were so many displaced people unable to find work that they simply starved to death. Crofting communities that had survived the initial purges became severely overcrowded with refugees from those early clearances and from collapsing industries. Some landowners paid for evicted tenants to emigrate, in what became known as "Assisted Passages." The tenants had little to no say in the matter.
And now, in 2026 in Spain there are hundreds of evacuated villages, there are thousands of families who have lost their homes and/or farms and therefore, their livelihoods, thousands of animals have been affected and tens of thousands of people have been forced to leave their homes for days. In recent weeks, large fires have forced the evacuation of dozens of municipalities and the Government has reported 211 areas affected and declared them "civil protection emergencies." So, what is Sanchez doing about all of this? Well, he’s fecked off on holiday to Lanzarote, occupying a Palace that belongs to the Spanish people and which he has no right to use whatsoever as he has no Sovereignty over it. Furthermore, 100,000 Moroccan males have recently invaded the Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla on the North African coast. Sanchez has done nothing at all to defend the Sovereignty of Spain in a quite spectacular manner that has brought down the condemnation of no less than 22 member states of the EU – some of whom have already closed their borders to Spain. It’s well known that the King of Morocco has some dirt on Sanchez that was provided to him by Mossad, who bugged Sanchez’s mobile phone with the notorious Pegasus app when he was in Israel, which is obviously playing a huge part in these shenanigans. However, as usual, there are a plethora of different versions regarding who did what when and why. It now seems certain that the immigrants were shipped to the Ceuta border by the Moroccan Police and then told to go into Ceuta while the Spanish authorities did nothing to stop them. The mainstream media have been lying through it's teeth about the situation, downplaying the incident and claiming that most of the immigrants have already returned to Morocco, but that is a lie. Approximately 15,000 remain in Ceuta alone. The truly outstanding feature of Sanchez’s reaction is that he has deployed 60 police and Guardia Civil, a gun boat and some helicopters TO PROTECT HIMSELF ON LANZAROTE – all paid for by the Spanish taxpayers, including the people of Ceuta and Melilla, whom he has left with nothing except an inflatable barrage in the sea that is about as much use as a chocolate frying pan and already deflating.
Sanchez’s excuse for ‘regularising’ all the illegal immigrants already in Spain was to allegedly fill vacant jobs within agriculture, tourism and the ‘service sector’. This situation is blamed on Spain’s ‘ageing population’ which is unable to maintain it’s supposed “growing economy” and contribute to social security… and let’s not forget taxes and election votes for Sanchez. The thing is though, pretty soon there will be no agriculture in Spain and all the millions of Spaniards who’s livelihoods and homes have already been burnt to ashes – where will they go and what will they do to earn a living? One day, his lies will choke him… hopefully. Maybe they’ll all be given “Assisted Passages” to emigrate… Morocco maybe?
Even before all of this, the media has been full of revelations about Sanchez and his organised crime family/network, otherwise known as the P.S.O.E. (Partido Socialista Obrero Español,) but the mafia bosses are still driving the country further and further into total ruin. These criminal proceedings must be due for a world record as being the most protracted ever – you can be sure that if any ‘normal’ person had committed even one percent of these crimes then they would have been put behind bars years ago. Speaking of which, Zapatero, the ex-President of Spain and, according to his own account, of Jewish ancestry, is also being prosecuted for fraud, amongst other things, like his own involvement in organised crime and the funding of revolutionary activity worldwide. But still, it carries on all around us. Where is the Justice?
We can look back and see that the land clearances of the eighteenth century were driven by greed and that’s still true of what’s happening now in 2026, but there’s a much bigger agenda in play and it has nothing to do with sheep. Or maybe it has, as this time we are the sheep and like all good sheep we will graze wherever we are told to – wherever the sheep dogs allow it because it’s all about control.
In 2026 you can’t graze, or browse the internet without being abused, your privacy violated, your every click recorded and analysed, or your comments and messages monitored and scanned for ‘hate speech’ or ‘subversive’ content. Every website you visit can identify you and your device from your digital fingerprint, see where else you’ve been, what operating system you are using, and pretty soon your exact age – and that alone will decide where you can graze.
Before long, you won’t even have a Desktop Computer, or a Laptop, in your home or your office. The prices and availability of devices that store digital data have been artificially manipulated in order to force more and more of you to use Cloud Storage. Software developers now don’t want you to buy, download and install their programs, sorry "apps," any more, they want you to rent them and use them online in your browser. Have you noticed that all the Ai websites which once allowed you to create content for free back in 2025 now want you to subscribe and pay a recurring subscription charge in 2026?
Have you also noticed that you can now rent actual computers online? However, it’s nothing like Radio Rentals did back in the last century with radios and TVs, you don’t actually get anything physical. Instead you get a make-believe ‘virtual’ computer that’s based in some god-knows-where data centre (probably one that’s been built on top of a few villages in Spain) and a bill to pay every month. All you do is connect to it on your mobile phone… or whatever screen-based access device they might come up with in the near future. There will be absolutely no choices regarding what measures you might wish to take in order to protect your privacy, no Cookie AutoDelete, no CanvasBlocker, no GeoSpoof, no uBlock Origin, no Font Fingerprint Defendar, no Waterfox Browser and probably no VPNs.
You will have no power of control over your personal data, no right of uncontrolled possession, use, or disposal of it either. “Every breath you take, every move you make, Ai’ll be watching you,” as the song says. But of course, we will all be so much safer and it will help to combat Climate Change and anyone who disagrees, well, as that other song says, “He can’t be a man 'cause he doesn't smoke the same cigarettes as me!” Not that you’ll be allowed to smoke cigarettes of course, I just used that lyric to illustrate how targetted marketing can manipulate people’s opinions.
“By branding censorship as ‘safety,’ surveillance as ‘protection,’ and political conformity as ‘civic duty,’ European states have constructed a system where dissent is pathologized and criminalized. When calling a politician a name can trigger a police raid on a private home, when the state is watching every word you type in a message to a friend, and when peaceful public protest can be outlawed by administrative decree, freedom of speech [is] being actively dismantled by the very institutions sworn to protect it…
“...In truth, it is no surprise that governments are targeting the internet with such urgency: decentralized digital spaces represent an existential threat to centralized state power. For decades, state-sanctioned narratives and traditional media monopolies allowed governments to maintain a near-monopoly on public perception. The open internet shattered this model, as it allowed citizens across borders to communicate instantaneously, bypass institutional filters, and share raw, “unvetted” information. When people can speak freely across borders, traditional state propaganda loses its grip, making the subjugation of the internet the primary imperative for modern political control.” (Source)
I first started working in IT in 1986. I left it all behind professionally in 2002. During that period I felt the winds of change blowing through every digital pixel. In the beginning, IT and the Internet, was all so fresh. It promised to be liberating, educating, so assisting, so communicating and so hopeful. That lasted about as long as it took for Microsoft to release Windows 8, 9 and then 10, which was the writing on the wall for the future.
By the way, you should be aware that the number of fraudulent websites has increased dramatically recently. If you find a product being sold on an unfamiliar website that you are interested in and the asking price is much lower than normal, don’t rush in and buy it straight away. Go to Trustpilot.com and do a search for the website, then read the reviews, it could save you from losing a great deal of money.
I hate it whenever I hear that. The thing is though, annoyingly, it is logical, but that doesn’t make it right. Just think about that sentence for a minute… Deep down, you know it’s wrong, but you just don’t really know why it’s wrong. You don’t ‘think’ it’s wrong, you ‘feel’ it’s wrong. Since 911, we’ve all been conditioned and pre-programmed with fear and suspicion… fear of suspicion and suspicion of fear. Our personal data became the object of desire for those who would apparently do us harm. Our data had to be protected. Problem, Reaction, Solution – data protection laws. We had to trust that commercial and government organisations would care for our data under the new laws. However, it all leaked like a sieve of course. Then later, after many basic human rights had been whittled away, along came all the “-isms” – racism, radicalism, nazi-ism, denialism, extremism, etc. Since the Scamdemic, these words have been used as weapons against anyone who disagrees with the mainstream status quo. And now, if you’re reluctant to share access to your personal data you’re probably a racist, a radical, a nazi, a denialist, an extremist or a pervert, and your personal data will prove it, which is why you’re hiding it. Come on now, own up! Only kidding. You know that there’s nothing to hide, but now your resistance is interpreted as evidence of your guilt. But, you’re only guilty of resistance, you, and only you, should have Sovereignty over your own personal data.
There has been an even worse development than this, and it’s more despicable – the False Accusation. Along with all the “-isms” and “-ists” came an intense focus on male violence against women. I’m not denying that this is an important issue in itself, however, it has now been weaponised, especially against white males. We are now in a situation whereby a man can be sanctioned simply by an accusation. He can lose everything in the process, his reputation, home, any pension payments and access to his children. If the false allegation involves paedophilia, rape or any kind of sexual abuse, then he will not only be judged in a court of law, but in the media (social and other) by his ‘friends’, his associates, his family and his neighbours. The state is totally committed to supporting the false accusation in an “all victims will be believed” policy. This is a very powerful weapon and more and more people are using it to attain their selfish goals, whether it be revenge, the removal of competition or rivals, or just plain greed and malice. It’s a deadly weapon as it results in suicide on many occasions, as it’s preferable to the state sponsored living hell that the falsely accused are forced to suffer.
Currently Youtube is awash with Ai created channels that deal in nostalgia – how great everything was in 1960’s/70’s/80’s Britain, or Madrid, or wherever, and how much everything has changed for the worse. I am of the same generation as many of the people who comment on these videos and who unanimously agree that things were better back then and that they would go back in a heartbeat if they could. The thing is though, would they go back in order to live through that same transition from those times to these, or would they actually do what they failed to do back in those times to prevent the deterioration we have now? The saddest part of it all is the sheer number of comments from people who have given up all hope, who feel they have already lived through the best part of their lives back then and don’t want to live in this awful world any longer. They are simply waiting to die, with no fear of doing so. Is that the purpose behind these Ai documentaries – to show people exactly what they have lost and that there is no hope of ever getting anything like it back again?
The famous British Nose Pipe of the 1960’s.
Often the victim of Nose Pipe bans during dry summers.
I was drawn to some of these videos, because they spoke of my own past and became a kind of catalyst for the realisation that not only is the Ai narration of the English language hopeless in terms of pronunciation, (why don’t people use phonetic spelling in their scripts?) but also the more pertinent realisation that the foundations for what we have now were actively being laid during those days, but nobody saw it at the time because it was all hidden in plain sight beneath ‘monetisation’, workers rights, ‘progress’, extremely dodgy nutritional health, TV comedy series, hostile takeovers, out-of-town shopping malls, ‘privatisation’, public health and just plain greed.
These nostalgia channels are not quite all they seem to be. They began appearing about a year ago (Sept. 2025.) Many are simply copies of each other with a different Ai voice doing the narration. Even within the same channel you will see the exact same Ai generated clips appearing in multiple videos with slightly different titles. What’s very weird is that some of the British nostalgia channels are American based?!* Strangely, these American British nostalgia channels are narrated by an American artificially incompetent voice and when they’re talking about British cars from the 60’s or 70’s they show pictures of American cars on American roads driven by American people who all seem to be dressed as clowns. Of course, when they actually show British cars they’re nearly always in a terrible state, with rust, faded paint and often left-hand drive. The most worrying aspect is how whenever Ai generated ‘footage’ shows the inside of a UK house from the 50’s, 60’s 70’s or 80’s, at mealtimes, or during food preparation, or anywhere inside, everything looks absolutely filthy dirty. Food from the period is shown as having been something totally gross and disgusting that apparently all tasted “metallic” and which our parents, or the school-dinner ladies, forced us to eat and that everyone hated – all of which is a complete lie and manipulation. And apparently, we all had a great innovation in our kitchens in the form of a serving hatch through to the dining room. However, according to Ai, in Britain we all wanted to be like Americans during the 1980’s and have open plan kitchen-dinning rooms. So, what did we do? We bricked up the serving hatches and then knocked the feckin wall down after! Honestly, we weren’t that stupid and we weren’t that filthy – furthermore, the food we ate was real food, not chemicals or insects, it kept us alive and healthy, and most of it tasted great.
A rare surviving image of the short-lived (for obvioous reasons) 1950’s sport of Formula One Chicken.
This manipulation of the past is going on everywhere. Rare books are being soaked up by faceless global organisations who feed them to their Ai. Anything that doesn’t fit with the globalist climate change woke agenda is removed and the originals are destroyed leaving only the digital lies.
I feel a kind of ‘public duty’ to expose and give examples of how to tell if what you are watching has been created by Ai… Artificial Incompetence. To that end I will be illustrating this article with images and clips from some of these nostalgia videos. Well, to be honest, they’re also hilarious, which is more likely to be the real reason I’m using them. By far the easiest way is from the mispronunciation of words, especially proper names. "Driver" comes out as 'drivver', "read" when it should be 'red', or "read" when it should be 'reed', etc.
It used to be said that the 20th century saw the greatest concentration of ‘change’ of any century. However, that has only ever applied to technological developments, if we’re talking about the actual structure and form of society itself, then the last 150 years stands out as an equal alongside the ‘Wasteland’ period after the 10th century cataclysm with its forcible introduction of the Feudal System and organised religions. Pre-existing cultural identities were lost, completely wiped out by the Normans and the religionists. The same is happening now and has been ever since WWII ended – which seems to have been part two of a man-made version of the 10th century cataclysm that began with WWI and the creation of communist Russia and then there was a brief respite known as The Great Depression, swiftly followed by WWII and the creation of Israel.
If we look at the likes of Donald Trump and Pedro Sanchez closely, it’s obvious that their mental deterioration is accompanied by a physical deterioration. No amount of make-up, or Ai, can hide it. Is this some kind of Natural Justice at work? Is this the phenomena that used to be referred to as the consequence of “selling your soul to the devil?” Is it some kind of Karmic retribution? Well, I think there’s more to it than that.
Sanchez looking like he's wearing his Dad’s clothes
Before I eventually get around to what I came to say, there’s something I’d like to share regarding the whole Sovereignty of the Land and the Sacred Marriage theme which I have featured so prominently in recent articles. I came across it quite by accident when I was looking through some old documents for a completely unrelated purpose. It’s a declaration from the Guildhall in Lincoln establishing one of my distant relatives as the Lord Mayor of Lincoln some 35 years ago.
“The Mayor is the first citizen of Lincoln and is in office for one year. He is elected by the Council Members and ‘married’ to the City by his predecessor handing him the Thumb Ring.”
So, even in 1991 the exact same principle of Sovereignty through Sacred Marriage is evident and even then it wasn’t just associated with Monarchs.
“The word that describes a Sovereign’s responsibilities, duties, and property is ‘royal prerogative’. This term encompasses the various powers and privileges that a monarch holds in relation to governance and state affairs.” (Source)
These words illustrate precisely the corruption that came to infect all Sovereigns – “Privilege.” It’s as plain as the nose on your face (once you’ve removed that bloody nose pipe) that the arch-villain, Sanchez, believes he has ‘royal prerogatives’ which justify his and his family’s, regular use of the nation's royal palace on Lanzarote, their treatment of ‘The Falcon’, Spain’s ministerial plane, as their own personal transportation, their ‘untouchable’ status, etc., etc. The advent of the Abrahamic religions took away the true meaning of Sovereignty and turned it into “The Holy Grail” that was only attainable by the purest and most perfect ‘Christian Knight’. Or, even more obscurely, it became just a cup that Jesus supposedly drank from at the Last Supper.
“sovereign(n.)...
“...late 13c., soverain, "superior, ruler, master, one who is superior to or has power over another," from Old French soverain "sovereign, lord, ruler," noun use of adjective meaning "highest, supreme, chief" (see sovereign (adj.)). Specifically by c. 1300 as "a king or queen, one who exercises dominion over people, a recognized supreme ruler of a realm." Also of Church authorities and heads of orders or houses as well as local civic officials.” (Source: etymologyonlne.com)
‘Dominion’, there’s another interesting word…
‘In law, "power of control, right of uncontrolled possession, use, and disposal" (1650s).’ (Source: ibid.)
I find it hard to believe that this meaning didn’t appear until the 1650s, because for me, it’s the original and true meaning of the word Sovereignty, never mind ‘dominion’, which always reminds me of ‘domination’. Actually, that’s not surprising really as the meanings are almost identical:
“domination(n.)...
“...late 14c., dominacioun, "rule, control by means of superior ability, influences, resources, or position; the exercise of power in ruling," from Old French dominacion "domination, rule, power" (12c.) (Source: ibid.)
Just for the record, this is the etymology entry for “Sovereignty:”
“sovereignty(n.)...
“...late 14c., soverainte, "pre-eminence, excellence, superiority;" also "authority, rule, supremacy of power or rank," from Anglo-French sovereynete, Old French souverainete, from soverain (see sovereign (adj.))…
“...early 14c., of persons, "great, superior, supreme;" mid-14c., "having supreme power;" from Old French soverain "highest, supreme, chief," from Vulgar Latin *superanus "chief, principal" (source also of Spanish soberano, Italian soprano), from Latin super "over." Of remedies or medicines, "potent in a high degree," from late 14c.”(Source: ibid.)
I think the Vulgar Latin has it spot-on, these days they’re all a bunch of superanus’s. The development of the definitions above illustrates very clearly just how the “Privilege” infection developed and even mutated further into superiority, excellence and supremacy. It’s as if the mere fact of being placed in a position of authority somehow automatically bestows these qualities upon the individual – or at least that’s what the individual believes – I cite Sanchez again to prove that point. Becoming a ‘celebrity’ these days has the same effect.
During the 1960’s, Morris had to farm-out production of their Minor 1000 to a village in Somerset.
Each house produced one car as you can see from the picture, where they are undergoing a rigorous inspection by the quality controller.
Let’s remind ourselves of the basic original meaning of Sovereignty (according to my reckoning that is,)
"power of control, right of uncontrolled possession, use, and disposal"
Now, I would also like to remind you of a Grail Legend concerning Gawain and Sovereignty that was discussed in the last part of the DECs…
In ‘The Wedding of Sir Gawain and Dame Ragnall’, Gawain must marry a hideous ugly hag to save the life of Arthur. This he does and on their wedding night, Gawain’s new bride turns into a ravishingly beautiful woman. However, this change is not permanent, he must choose whether she should be ugly during the daytime and beautiful at night, or vice versa. He decides to allow her to make the choice for herself and in doing so he breaks the spell, having given her the right of “sovereignty” – to choose her own appearance according to her own nature and not exerting his own will over her. This is an allegory for the Goddess of Sovereignty, the representative of the land itself, testing the fitness of her earthly consort to rule. In the story, Gawain acts as Arthur’s surrogate, and is, at the same time, established as the Champion of the Goddess, who through him offers her blessing upon the land. This situation is perfectly acceptable in Celtic culture as the relationship of a sister’s son was considered of equal or even greater worth than ones own direct offspring.
Can you imagine what Sanchez or Trump would have done in that situation? Well, actually you can see what choice Sanchez would have made… his ‘wife’ would probably actually look female during the night. Anyway, Gawain gave his new bride the power of control, the right of uncontrolled possession and use over her own appearance.
Kids from the 1960’s when the Post Office used to put Letter Boxes in the road… apparently.
The girl on the right is hoping nobody notices that her Mum has hung her washing right across the front of 3 of the neighbour’s houses.
I don’t want to turn this into a ‘Jump the Shark’ episode, or keep regurgitating stuff from previous articles, but since beginning the research for ‘The Quest for the Lost Realm of Faërie’, the subject of Sovereignty has become a major feature in all subsequent articles. It was made even more compelling by my studies into the Grail Legends. The thing is though, is it just ‘history’ or is it something real? During this same period I watched as both Sanchez, Trump and others in similar positions, deteriorated physically and mentally before our very eyes and in unison with the deterioration they have wrought upon their kingdoms. Their kingdoms are becoming Wastelands and so are they. I adopted the name ‘The Fisher King Syndrome’ for their condition. I am convinced it is something very real.
OK, so how did the Sovereignty thing work back in the days before organised religions? As you read what follows, I would ask you to try and set aside any preconceptions you may have about Pagan Goddesses, such as The Dark Goddess concept which is just Christian conditioning designed to justify its condemnation of sexuality. We know from so-called myths and legends that The Goddess could appear physically, in a variety of different aspects, both human and animal. She would test prospective suitors in a similar way to the method used in the Gawain and Dame Ragnall tale related above. I don’t think these personal appearances by The Goddess were the ‘norm’, so the selection of a suitable Sovereign for a kingdom must have been driven by an intermediary – someone who had a presence in this world and The Otherworld (like the ‘Ælfgifus’) and who may even have been Fae.
What I’m talking about, is the selection process of finding someone who is worthy of becoming consort to The Goddess. The Goddess is the land and all of nature. If you deliberately and wilfully harm the land or any part of nature, then you harm The Goddess. The consort, or Sovereign Protector of The Goddess, must also be Sovereign Protector of The Land and all the nature that dwells upon it. The People of the land are also a part of nature and to harm them would also be to harm The Goddess. It’s very easy to see how the Feudal System was seen as complete and utter madness to the Pagan population.
I think it’s obvious that I’m not talking about sitting on a throne for a while, standing on a balcony and wafting your hand about, launching the odd ship, or dishing out medals to your lackies. Being The Sovereign Protector of The Goddess was something else entirely. For one thing, there were/are consequences for getting it wrong. The vows taken at the Sacred Marriage ceremony forged an intimate connection between the Sovereign Protector of The Goddess and The Land, including the Nature/Wildlife, the People, the animals and any Fae living upon it. This connection meant that any harm or damage done to ‘The Land’ as just defined, would result in harm or damage to the Sovereign Protector of The Goddess. Not only that, but any physical malady or failure in the moral or spiritual integrity of the Sovereign Protector of The Goddess, would also have consequences for ‘The Land’. This explains why in some cultures, their Sovereign was treated with kid gloves, being only brought out of his display cabinet on high-days and holidays, like my Mum’s best china dinner service, but I’ve covered all of this before.
Dad’s first attempt at parking his new car didn’t go well. Mum’s pushbike being parked in the same spot didn’t help either.
If we accept that the ‘Fisher King Syndrome’ is real then what are the implications? As the new mayor of Lincoln City showed back in 1991, this syndrome doesn’t just apply to Monarchs. As stated earlier, the term Sovereign didn’t only apply to kings and queens, but also to anyone who exercised dominion over somewhere or someone. It could be applied to a recognised supreme ruler of a realm, to the Church authorities, heads of orders or houses, as well as to local civic officials – hence the mayor of Lincoln. I assume that the more important positions involved more elaborate rituals, but it’s difficult to reconcile the Church authorities making vows to The Goddess, but then they obviously didn’t, well not consciously anyway. In fact I don’t suppose any of them did that after the advent of the organised religions when The Goddess became officially despised, but she lived on in the people's concept of The Land, The Realm or The Kingdom. The ‘Ælfgifus’ (details here and here,) were obviously a surviving remnant of the pre-cataclysm era and acted as a physical representative of The Goddess who adopted the role of a normal human wife. I feel sure they were either ‘gifted’ or specially trained for the role, although Guinevere, or ‘The White Fairy’ was totally Fae.
“Jumping the Broomstick,” also known as the Besom Ceremony, dates back further than anyone wants to admit these days and is found within many cultures. The Broom signified fertility, or so many supposed authorities claim. Others point out its cleansing and purification significance and relate it to the concept of ritually cleansing the sacred marriage space and a new joint beginning that sweeps away the past. I would like to point out that the besom broom became the trademark of Witches back in the 1500’s when the Church’s intense persecution of women and paganism began on an epic scale. Incidentally, many ‘recentists’ now claim that those witch-hunts were in fact a crack-down on coin forgers… personally, I’m not convinced about that at all.
Buying a new vehicle was one thing, but somebody should have told him it would need a driver to sit behind the wheel
The besom broom as a fertility symbol seems a bit too obvious. If we try to put ourselves back inside the Church’s 1500’s mindset, then the image of a woman astride a broomstick could quite easily be interpreted as the object being used as a phallic symbol, which would be just the sort of imagery the witch-hunters would love to use in their propaganda. It’s a short step from there to actually flying upon one, which was another obsession of the period. However, it seems clear that the besom broom was already a well established ritual Pagan implement by that time and one associated with the Sacred Marriage ceremony, which was still being used used in Pagan weddings during the medieval period. So, it had to be discredited and demonised. Unfortunately, all of the shenanigans that took place throughout that time, have completely obscured the original Pagan significance of the besom broom. 1837 saw the official introduction of non-Church, civil weddings in the UK. From that point on the Church of England adopted the term “broomstick wedding” to show its utter contempt for civil ceremonies.
So-called ‘modern witchcraft’ also sees the besom broom as a powerful magical object which embodies balance. The broom blends masculine energy (the wooden handle) and feminine energy (the bristles) into a harmonious whole making it a versatile tool for cleansing, protection, and transformative rituals. It is stored in an upright position with the bristles at the top. If you can imagine this in your mind’s eye then you can see exactly why it symbolises the conjunction of male and female energy... no need, here's 'one I made earlier'.
(Source)
Today it is used for cleansing spaces of negative energy, symbolically sweeping away unwanted influences and leaving the area purified. The besom broom also takes on an added significance as a tool of self-sovereignty and transformation. It is used to "sweep away" personal limitations and restrictions, thus enabling the manifestation of one’s Sovereign Power.
Who knows, perhaps originally the besom broom represented the joining together of The Goddess and her Consort and symbolised the cleansing and purification of The Land, keeping it free from negative energy and unwanted influences. It’s no wonder that the ordinary folk of The Land also used the exact same symbolism for the joint Sovereignty of their own part of the kingdom.
A 1960’s alcoholic British woman is left totally bewildered by the Jaguar E-Type/MGBGT/Mini chimera she just walked into.
By far the greatest and most devastating change of all has been the expulsion of The Goddess from coronation or inauguration ceremonies. Originally the entire Sacred Marriage ceremony was a joint sharing of responsibilities whereby the Consort protected and cared for The Land in the physical realm, with The Goddess doing exactly the same in The Otherworld, where she controls all the forces of Nature and works towards the same end. This aspect has been completely lost and deliberately forgotten, replaced entirely by selfish ‘royal prerogative’, privilege and mystical chalices.
Just lately it has occurred to me that this “Fisher King Syndrome” may have some influence on everyone on a personal level. At its most basic, the marriage ceremony itself is clearly a living remnant of the same Sacred Marriage ceremony. The ‘Bride’ (a name of The Goddess,) The Bridegroom (the horse was also an aspect of The Goddess and those who looked after horses were male and known as Grooms,) The Bridesmaids (self explanatory.) The Marriage Vows are absolutely Christian by now of course, but they still retain the concept of taking an oath of allegiance and loyalty to each other and a shared bond of both care and consequence.
Even in the 1950’s British housewives still had to send their cloned slaves out to queue for food with the family's ration books.
I wonder what exactly they sold in an 'Umeceted' shop? It was obviously very popular back then.
Becoming the member of a society can involve similar vows and some, such as Freemasonry, also involve dire consequences for breaking them. Becoming the employee of an employer involves a contract, a joint agreement that also has consequences for misbehaviour. Buying a house or land also requires a contract and a deed. These set out your Sovereignty over the defined plot of land… unless you’re unfortunate enough to buy a leasehold property or live in a flat. I won’t go into the minefield of controversy regarding what right anyone has to sell The Land to another, otherwise this will turn into a novel ...again.
Modern business practises undermine Sovereignty over products and brands. Once upon a time someone might have had a vision to produce and share something that would be useful to society. They would set up a company to produce that something and provide employment. The owner of the business had complete Sovereignty over it and its products. He had the exclusive "power of control, right of uncontrolled possession, use, and disposal" of his business and its products. However, then he might want to expand his market and/or build bigger premises, which may require outside investment or a loan. He will be tempted and even expected, to list the stock of his company, via shares, to be freely traded on the Stock Exchange where it will be “publicly quoted.” As a result he ends up with a Board of Directors and lots of shareholders. The Stock Exchange is all about trading in the Sovereignty of businesses, or commercial kingdoms. Anyone can obtain a share in the Sovereignty of a business without making any vows of loyalty to it, it’s products or its employees. Get enough shares and you can take over the business, gaining the "power of control, right of uncontrolled possession, use, and disposal," or Sovereignty, over it. The board of directors are required by their responsibilities in law to obtain the best value for their shareholders in any bid for their shares. In the case of a hostile takeover, any resistance would be subject to legal action. Once the Sovereignty of any company is owned by its shareholders, then the directors owe their duties to them and only them. So, if the new majority shareholders decide to strip all of the company’s assets and totally destroy it, purely for the purpose of greed and selfish financial reward, there is nothing the original creator of it can do about it – and this practise is fully supported by the law. The Board of Directors and the shareholders will only care about their own financial share in the proceedings – nothing more. Once you own the Sovereignty you can take that business and relocate it anywhere you like – usually to a ‘developing country’ where slave labour is cheap and ingredients, or parts, are even cheaper. You could sell off all the companies assets and rob the employee’s pension fund, which is exactly what happened to British Home Stores (BHS) in the UK, where the culprit was punished with a knighthood to go along with all of his millions. You could then sell the same products back in their original market… well, for a while anyway until the original customers realise that the quality has disappeared and the price has skyrocketed, which is the real trademark of modern unadulterated greed. This exact same scenario has already affected all of the UK's major industries.
As late as the 1970’s, Britain still had petrol pumps right beside the road, according to Ai.
Freeloading pedestrians would lean against the cars at the pumps, allowing their clothing to get hitched-up on the door handles or wing mirrors.
This later became known as hitch-hiking.
I’m sure we’re all well aware of the bullshit language that we’ve all been pre-programmed with regarding modern business practise. “There’s no room for sentimentality in business.” “All’s fair in Love, War and Business.” “You don’t make friends in business, only profits.” Etc., etc., it’s exactly the same disease as I highlighted earlier with regard to monarchs, whereby The Goddess and her cooperation, trust and faith has been completely removed from the equation. In the business instance, the passion and the vision of its creator have been removed, along with the loyalty and welfare of the employees and the joint commitment to quality and excellence of the products. It’s a microcosm of the larger original Sacred Marriage situation that’s also been completely redefined in order to serve a totally different purpose – the sacrifice of everything good and wholesome just for greed, ego and self-aggrandisement.
1950’s Belfast, Northern Ireland...or so the Ai said in the video
I was born during the mid-1950’s in England. I left the country around 2004 and haven’t really been back, except for a very brief visit many years ago. The changes that have taken place in the UK since I left have been devastating. The cultural identity of Britain has been shattered. I want to relate one particular story to illustrate my point regarding the Sovereignty of businesses and products. It concerns Cadbury’s, a very British brand of what was probably one of the finest chocolates ever made.
John Cadbury was a Quaker who lived in Birmingham, England, from 1801 to 1889. He opened a shop there in 1824 where he sold tea, coffee and drinking chocolate. Being a Quaker he believed that alcohol was the curse of society and he hoped to turn people away from it by offering them chocolate instead. So, in 1842, he began selling chocolate for eating, rather than drinking, which was probably the first in Britain. In 1847 John Cadbury formed a partnership with his brother, Benjamin. They established an office in London, and seven years later in 1854, they received the royal warrant as manufacturers of chocolate and cocoa to Queen Victoria. However, from then on the company went into decline.
In 1861 John Cadbury's sons, Richard and George took over the business. At the time of the takeover, the business was in rapid decline: the number of employees had reduced from 20 to 11, and the company was losing money. By shifting the focus from tea and coffee to chocolate, and increasing the quality of their products Cadbury’s became profitable again and in 1866, Cadbury’s introduced an improved cocoa into Britain through the use of a new pressing technique developed in the Netherlands, which removed some of the unpalatable cocoa butter from the cocoa bean. In 1861, the company created ‘Fancy Boxes’, the first ever decorated box of chocolates. In 1868, the boxes were produced in the shape of a heart for Valentine's Day. The creation of the first chocolate Easter Egg followed in 1875 and by 1893 they had a range of 19 different varieties of Easter Eggs… a very pagan symbol of the Spring Equinox.
Mum manages to slice the boy’s ear off as she pointlessly lifts him through the door’s window frame, just as the door was being opened for him.
They all seem to be very pleased with themselves, despite not being able to see where they are going because the road signs are all facing the wrong way.
Their car must be a very very early 1960’s prototype of the McLaren F1, with it’s experimental central driving position.
Cadbury's moved to the south of Birmingham in 1878 and constructed their famous Bourneville factory. In 1893, George Cadbury bought 120 acres (49 ha) of land close to the Bourneville factory and planned, at his own expense, a model, or garden village which would 'alleviate the evils of modern more cramped living conditions' for Cadbury’s employees. You should see it, it’s still fantastic even today. By 1900, the estate included 314 cottages and houses set on 330 acres (130 ha) of land. Being Quakers, there were no pubs included on the estate, but loyal and hard-working employees were treated with great respect, relatively high wages and good working conditions. Cadbury’s also pioneered pension schemes, joint works committees and fully staffed medical facilities. This was at a time when most working class people were forced to rent appalling 'back-to-back' slums, that were quite literally death traps in terms of health. The mortality rate was 40% higher than for any other type of housing, but despite this, Councils failed, or were unwilling, to prohibit the construction and rental of such despicable and disgusting dwellings.
The Cadbury Factory in Bournville, photographed in 1920
(Source)
In 1900, the Bournville Village Trust was set up to formally control the development of the estate, independently of George Cadbury or the Cadbury company. Elizabeth Cadbury succeeded her husband as chair of the Bournville Village Trust in 1922. The trust focused on providing schools, hospitals, museums, public baths and reading rooms. All of this gave Bournville an almost campus-like atmosphere, with a triangular village green, infant and junior schools, the School of Art and the Day Continuation School (originally intended for young Cadbury employees) and a host of events such as fêtes and Maypole dances. The carillon (a kind of organ that plays bells) and a Quaker meeting house are also beside the village green.
The Bourneville model village incorporated a park and recreation areas into the village’s development, actively encouraging swimming, walking and all forms of outdoor sports. In the early 1920s, extensive additional open lands were purchased and redeveloped into football and hockey pitches together with a grassed running track. Rowheath Pavilion was designed and built in accordance with the instructions of George Cadbury and opened in July 1924. At that time, it served as the clubhouse and changing rooms for the acres of sports playing fields, several bowling greens, a fishing lake and an outdoor swimming lido, a natural mineral spring forming the source for the lido's healthy waters. The Rowheath Pavilion itself, which still exists, was used for balls and dinners and the whole area was specifically for the benefit of the Cadbury workers and their families with no charges for the use of any of the sporting facilities by Cadbury employees or their families. Health and Safety regulations related to outdoor public swimming facilities, closed the lido in the 1970’s, which was not helped by complaints of noise disturbance by residents of the newly built Oak Farm estate. Cadbury's also built the Bournville indoor swimming baths on Bournville Lane (separate buildings for 'girls' and men), the Valley pool boating lake and the picturesque cricket pitch adjacent to the factory site, that was made famous as the picture on boxes of Milk Tray chocolates throughout the 1950s and early 1960s.
The Bourneville Estate at the turn of the 20th century
(Source)
I have explained all of this to illustrate how Cadbury’s honoured the Sovereignty of their ‘kingdom’. They didn’t simply exploit their products, workers, customers and suppliers for their own selfish greed. They cared. In the 20th century Cadbury’s went from strength to strength, despite two world wars, when the Bournville factory was sequestered by the government for the war efforts. They opened new factories both at home and overseas. Cadbury’s Dairy Milk became legendary.
A 1950’s housewife counting the pennies to see if she can afford turn the microwave oven on... Hang on a minute, a microwave oven in 1950's Britain?
Of course, it couldn’t last, not under the new world order. In 1969 Cadbury’s merged with Schweppes, breaking the Sovereignty of the original Cadbury family. By 1986 Cadbury’s had lost its licence for the production of Cadbury brand biscuits and drinking chocolate after Cadbury-Schweppes sold its its Beverages and Foods division to a management buyout, known as Premier Brands, for £97 million… which is why they have tasted like shit ever since. In the early 1990’s the financial world was rocked by a series of revelations and scandals, such as those of Robert Maxwell, the pension highwayman, and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), who went bust and lost billions of dollars. To counter this, the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, chaired by Sir Adrian Cadbury, issued The Cadbury Report, entitled ‘Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance’. It was a report that sets out recommendations on the arrangement of company boards and accounting systems "to mitigate corporate governance risks and failures."
Ironically, this report did nothing to prevent Cadbury’s fate. In 2008 Cadbury and Schweppes dissolved their merger. During the first decade of the 21st century, Cadbury began selling off parts of its Sovereignty and closing some factories. Production was transferred to other plants in England and to Poland. Just before the final axe fell upon the ancient neck of Cadbury’s, they replaced some of the cocoa butter in their non-UK chocolate products with palm oil. This was a disaster. Palm Oil not only adversely affected taste and texture, but it was also being given the blame for the destruction of the Rainforests – both points firmly driven home by foreign consumers. Cadbury stated that it was reversing the decision and also that it would source its future cocoa bean supplies through Fair Trade channels.
It seems like too much of a coincidence that the American corporation, Kraft Foods, were lurking around at this exact same time, trying for a hostile takeover. In September 2009, their first bid was rejected. On 19 January 2010, it was announced that Cadbury and Kraft Foods had reached a deal and that Kraft would purchase Cadbury for £11.5bn (US$18.9bn). The shareholders had sold Cadbury's 'down the river'. Kraft had to borrow £7 billion (US$11.5bn) in order to finance the takeover. TIt was RBS (the NatWest Group plc,) a bank 84% owned by the British Government, who funded the Kraft takeover, can you believe that? The British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, stated that this takeover was, “very important to the British economy.” The bastard probably had shares in the bank. Even the Cadbury shareholders, who had been responsible for the success of the hostile takeover, protested over the mergers and acquisitions advisory fees charged by banks. The 'Unite' trade union estimated that a takeover by Kraft could put 30,000 jobs "at risk." The British public went mental.
During the 1970’s, special editions of the Mini were produced with an extra bonnet (hood) and a chameleon paint job that would completely change the car’s colour and, it seems, its passengers as well. I’ve had 4 Minis, at one time or another, and they were all brilliant. Every driver should drive a Mini at least once in their life.
In January 2010 prospective buyer Kraft pledged to honour Cadbury's commitment to the Fair Trade program, but this was another lie. Instead they created their own unregulated version of it and simply plastered their bastardised products with a meaningless logo.
On 2 February 2010, having secured their £7 billion loan from British Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, the American Kraft corporation secured over 75% of Cadbury shares in order to be able to de-list it from the stock market and fully integrate it as part of Kraft. On 3 February, the Chairman, chief executive and the chief financial officer, all announced their resignations. On the 5th February the company announced that Cadbury shares would be de-listed on 8 March and a British National Treasure and commercial icon was lost forever. That loss was felt immediately when Kraft closed the Somerdale Factory, at Keynsham, with the loss of 400 jobs, despite Kraft CEO, Irene Rosenfeld, having made an assurance not to do so during takeover negotiations, (yes, that is a Jewish name.) Production was transferred to Poland. (Just out of interest regarding The Fisher King Syndrome, there has been much speculation regarding Gordon Brown's mental health, particularly concerning the use of anti-depressants, but there is no confirmed public disclosure about his current health status.)
On 4 August 2011, Kraft Foods announced it would be splitting into two companies beginning on 1 October 2012. The snack and confectionery business of Kraft became Mondelez International, of which Cadbury would become a subsidiary. Irene Rosenfeld was made CEO of Mondelez. Beginning in 2015, Rosenfeld began closing Cadbury factories in several developed countries including Ireland, Canada, the United States, and New Zealand. Production was shifted to "advantaged" countries, like China, India, Brazil, and Mexico. The closure of Cadbury factories in centres such as Dublin, Montreal, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Dunedin in New Zealand generated outcries from the local populations. The plan received approval from several market shareholders including the Australian and New Zealand banks: Westpac and ASB Bank.
During 2016, Mondelēz and Rosenfeld were criticised by both Republican candidate Donald Trump and Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders for outsourcing approximately 600 US jobs from Chicago to Salinas, Mexico, prompting the Oreo Boycott, whereby the biscuits and other Nabisco products, were left on the shelves by the public. Worker’s pickets also took place at various events Rosenfeld attended, as well as outside her own home.
On 23 December 2024, it was announced that after 170 years of its association with the British monarchy, since the reign of Queen Victoria, Cadbury would now no longer hold its Royal Warrant under King Charles III. No reason was given, but the popular and unconfirmed theory is that Charles had been urged by campaign group B4Ukraine to withdraw warrants from companies "still operating in Russia" after the invasion of Ukraine. A Mondelez spokesperson stated that, "Whilst we are disappointed to be one of hundreds of other businesses and brands in the UK [...] to not have a new warrant awarded, we are proud to have previously held one, and we fully respect the decision." BUT MONDELEZ NEVER HELD A ROYAL WARRANT AND NEVER WILL. (Source for Cadbury’s information: Wikipedia.)
“Together they…” managed to get all their luggage safely stowed away all around the engine
I apologise to those who may have found this section boring, but this same story, or a very similar one, could be repeated thousands of times over for thousands of other British Brands and old established companies that have either been bought and transferred overseas or simply completely destroyed after having had all their assets stripped – the commercial equivalent of The Wasteland. It’s the reason why so many European towns are now ghost towns, with once busy High Streets mere shadows of their former glory. It’s easy to assume that internet based shopping and out-of-town malls have forced High Street stores and shops out of business, but that’s far from the whole story. The truth is that most of them have suffered the same, or a similar fate to Cadbury’s. The UK lost its Coal Industry during the 70’s and 80’s. The steelworks soon followed, then shipbuilding. The British Car Industry was wilfully annihilated from the inside. In the 80’s, Margaret Thatcher sold off 1.5 million British Council Houses at knock-down prices, by 1995 it was 2.1 million which had raised over £51 billion. Very little of that money was used to replace the houses that were now in the private sector. Then what followed was a Gordon Gecko style assault upon established British commerce. Now agriculture is in the crosshairs because you will not even be allowed any Sovereignty whatsoever over what you eat in the future.
This was a special Reverse F1 event, held in the 1960’s, where the drivers sat facing backwards and drove in reverse gear.
Spectators were very confused and the event was never repeated… or even happened in the first place.
British culture as I knew it, has been totally wiped out, which was always the goal. The Sovereignty of the United Kingdom is now in the hands of greed ridden global corporations and faceless, soulless tycoons who have dismantled it piece by piece and redistributed it. This has been happening ever since the end of World War Two. Britain is not alone in this, it’s been happening everywhere with the exception of those so-called “advantaged” countries where democracy never sees the light of day and neither do the slave labourers. If you want to find British Culture these days, those “advantaged” countries are the places to look, where they’re busy trying to produce all the things that were taken from the UK, but failing in every aspect.
You may consider that commercial products and brands do not constitute a country’s Sovereignty, but you’d be mistaken. Mention roast beef and the Mini to any foreigner and they immediately think of Britain. The same goes for the E-Type Jaguar. It works with Spaghetti and Ferrari, or Frog’s Legs and Citroen, Paella and Seat. If you’re living in Communist China, making pairs of Clarks Shoes to be sold in Britain, working 12 hours a day, 6 days a week for a bag of peanuts, under hideous conditions, how loyal are you going to be to the ethos, quality and legacy of Clarks Shoes? You won’t give a stuff about any of it because it’s not a part of your culture, or even your life beyond being a slave to it. Go back in time to when Clarks Shoes were made in Street, a Somerset town in Britain, by people who’s grandparents probably did the same work and who probably attended the school that Clarks founded so that young men and women could combine working in the factory with continuing their education, or go to the theatre, the library, the open-air swimming pool, the town hall or the playing fields – all of which were established by Clarks, along with low-cost housing for its employees. Employee loyalty to the ethos, quality and legacy of Clarks Shoes under those circumstances would be unquestioned because it was a way of life as well as a part of local society and culture.
In the hope of attempting to be more explicit, I want to compare the Sovereignty of Cadbury’s and Clarks with that of a typical pre-cataclysm kingdom, which may sound a bit weird, but please bear with me. Cadbury’s and Clarks didn’t just create chocolate or shoes, they created living, breathing entities. – commercial kingdoms. Both families were Quaker and this endowed them with specific spiritual and moral values. Quakerism is really quite interesting as a religion, and you won’t see me saying that very often. In fact, you would be welcomed by ‘The Religious Society of Friends’, as they call themselves, even if you are an atheist, or a Pagan… or a Christian. Obviously Quakerism itself has evolved over the centuries – to its credit. Schisms developed regarding the interpretation of their principles, sometimes resulting in splinter groups. However, true to their principles of “Commitment to non-violence and conflict resolution,” and “Belief in the inherent worth and equality of all individuals,” the differences in interpretation were all accommodated and given their own space rather than being rejected outright, isolated or banned. Today, there are different ‘flavours’ of Quakerism to suit all palates, namely; Conservative; Evangelical; Gurneyites; Holiness; Liberal; Universalist; Non-theists...
Quaker beliefs are rooted in several fundamental principles that guide their faith and practices.
These are referred to as the S.P.I.C.E.S Principles:
Description
Emphasising a simple lifestyle and avoiding excess.
Commitment to non-violence and conflict resolution.
Living truthfully and authentically.
Fostering a sense of belonging and mutual support among members.
Belief in the inherent worth and equality of all individuals.
Responsibility for caring for the environment and the community.
The point is, both Cadbury’s and Clarks founded and operated their commercial kingdoms upon those S.P.I.C.E.S principles. Their belief in the concept of the ‘inner light,’ by which every individual has the ability to connect directly with the divine without the need for clergy, resonates with the Pagan Mother Goddess principle. Their rejection of dogma and belief in the ‘inner light,’ promotes personal spiritual experiences and encourages individuals to listen for guidance from within.
You could say that, by grace of their principles, the founders of both Cadbury’s and Clarks already had a spiritual agreement with The Goddess, or whatever particular name they used for ‘the divine’. This spiritual contract included the care and protection of The Land – being the ‘commercial kingdom’ comprising the employees, suppliers, local community, customers, the houses, the factories, plus the recreational, educational and healthcare facilities. It’s obvious from the record that, as long as that agreement lasted, both Cadbury’s and Clarks thrived. As soon as the Quaker families lost their Sovereignty over their own commercial kingdoms, the spiritual agreement was broken and then, so were Cadbury’s and Clarks.
There have been a great many successful Quaker established businesses throughout the world. Initially, when Quakerism was still relatively new, it was of course, the subject of severe persecution. “The Quakers were formed as a protest against the established Church and, crucially, members were excluded from universities and debarred from many public and civic offices along with other non-conformists. So professions such as medicine or the law were not open to them, which explains why so many gravitated towards business and commerce.” (Source: ibid) Another side-effect of this was that their isolation created an even greater sense of community between the Quaker owned businesses, who helped each other regardless of whether they were competitors or not. Please Note: the US company ‘Quaker Oats’, founded in the late 19th Century, still uses the image of a traditionally dressed Quaker on its cereal boxes – BUT they never had any connection to the Quakers whatsoever, they were simply trading on the assumed association with the Quaker's reputation for honesty.
(Source)
Tragically, just about all of the Quaker run enterprises began to disappear after World War II. They all lost their commercial Sovereignty when they were greedily swallowed up from the same putrid, publicly quoted pig’s trough of the Stock Exchange. Some of them were simply picked clean by the vultures in their bright red Gordon Gecko braces. Many others have been stripped of their remaining Quaker ethics and shipped abroad where they operate as mere shadows of their former glories. To me it’s abundantly clear that the World has lost something fundamental and very, very important – not just from the commercial sector, but from everything, even life itself.
If there’s a lesson to be learned from the Quaker’s foray into commercial enterprise, it’s that nothing exists in isolation. If you focus entirely upon maximising profits, but neglect and disregard quality, your employees and their working environment, your suppliers and customers – in other words, The Sovereignty of your commercial kingdom – then you will fail. If you are a Monarch who focuses entirely on your own “royal prerogative” and privilege, but neglects and disregards the coronation oath you made to The Goddess, The Land – the people, Nature, wildlife, trees and any other inhabitants, then you will also fail and bring the ‘Fisher King Syndrome’ down upon yourself and ruin upon your kingdom, which will become a Wasteland.
So, given that even pre-cataclysm Pagans ‘Jumped the Broomstick’ in a version of the Sacred marriage ceremony, does this suggest that there is even a personal aspect to the Sovereignty concept, including the ‘Fisher King Syndrome’?
Today, we each live our lives in increasing isolation. In general, there is no longer any feeling of ‘community’ and those that may have existed before, have all been contaminated, divided and splintered into dust. Any sense of belonging or support went with them. Neither is 'simple living' an option any more, bureaucracy masquerading as technology has seen to that, whereby every confrontation with it becomes a highly stressful conflict. I’m sure we all try our best to live authentically and honestly, but when those who govern us prove themselves to be nothing more than untouchable organised criminals, it’s no wonder that some people adopt that as their ‘role model’ to success. Where I live it’s become like the Wild West these days, where people do what they want when they want, with no regard for laws and no respect for anyone, or anything else. It’s behaviour like this that makes it so hard to believe in “the inherent worth and equality of all individuals,” plus, the blatant historic misuse of this ideal by Communism, makes it an even harder principle to trust. We have completely lost our individual Sovereignty over the stewardship and responsibility for the environment and the community. It’s all been taken out of our hands, then twisted and mutilated into a weapon to be used against us. Now, so-called ‘macho’ violence has been ruthlessly outlawed, but deliberately turning 250,000 hectares of forests, prime agricultural land and all of their associated communities, and their livestock, into a wasteland for redevelopment as solar farms, or data centres, is perfectly fine. Furthermore, allowing 100,000 illegal immigrants to invade your kingdom while you, as president, go on holiday and simply watch as they rape, rob and abuse the people of your kingdom, is an inexcusable abomination. I can only assume that there must be some powerful dark forces protecting him from the wrath of The Goddess, but even they can’t stop the inevitability of The Fisher King Syndrome.
During the 1960’s the VW Beetle was also available without a driver’s door for that special ‘wind up the trouser leg’ experience
It’s interesting to consider the modern-day situation of Monarchs and Presidents, or Prime Ministers, with regard to a kingdom’s Sovereignty – with whom does it rest? Both swear oaths upon being appointed, but over the last few centuries, governments have eaten away at the traditional power of the Monarchy, and in some cases replaced it completely. The King cannot do anything without the approval of the government, but then the government cannot even be formed without the approval of the King. It’s very reminiscent of the situation in what would be called ‘more primitive societies’, whereby the Monarch is merely a China Doll kept in a display cabinet and only taken out on high days and holidays. That system always makes me think it’s a devious way of avoiding ‘The Fisher King Syndrome’, so the government can do whatever it wants whilst all of the consequences are born by the Monarch, not the government.
This situation was illustrated quite clearly just recently in Spain. The King of Spain, Felipe VI, wanted to visit Ceuta following the Moroccan invasion, but Sanchez and his government would not sanction his visit. So, Felipe VI invited the governor of Ceuta to visit him in Madrid whilst Sanchez was on holiday in Lanzarote. On the day of the meeting, Sanchez produced propaganda showing that he was involved these meetings by video conference… except he wasn’t, the images were all Ai…
Wot? No Legs?
More recently this conflict over the restrictions placed upon the King has escalated. Following the supposed ‘second wave’ of immigrants on the 15th August, when the King of Morocco allegedly prevented another influx of illegal immigrants into Ceuta, Sanchez requested that Felipe VI should personally thank the King of Morocco for preventing another invasion. Felipe told Sanchez to “kiss my astrakhan coat!” or words to that effect, obviously recognising that Sanchez was trying to repair the relationship between Morocco and the EU, who have authorised the repatriation of all illegal immigrants from Ceuta and Melilla – the ones originally put there by the King of Morocco himself as part of his Sovereignty games. The situation now is that Felipe VI can visit wherever he wants, but any unauthorised visits will not be considered ‘official’, purely personal… which sounds ridiculous but, from Sanchez’s point of view, perhaps he believes it will divert ‘The Fisher King Syndrome’ repercussions of the whole immense cockup away from himself and onto Felipe VI? However, clearly that ‘passing the buck’ strategy doesn’t work, as witnessed by the physical and mental state of Sanchez, therefore a kingdom’s Sovereignty is obviously the responsibility of anyone who puts themselves in a position where they are responsible for it, from the King, to the major of Lincoln, to... you?
And finally, I have reached the crux of the matter and the reason for this article. We all have our own ‘kingdoms’ where we have the "power of control, right of uncontrolled possession, use, and disposal" over aspects of the overall kingdom, be it your land, your family, your animals, your business, your employees, your customers. Maybe you’re also the Akela of a local Scout group in your spare time, or the incumbent Grand Master of your Masonic Lodge, or the Tufty Club. Whatever it may be, you have put yourself in a position whereby you also have Sovereignty over aspects of the kingdom. So, the burning question is, if you abuse your position through neglect or selfishness, will The Fisher King Syndrome get you too? If you deny the right of self-Sovereignty to your children by being over-controlling, for example, or if you treat your pets or livestock badly, or your employees, if you rip-off your customers, if you burn down all the trees on your land and sell it for solar farms, if you allow foreigners to occupy your land and do nothing to defend it, if you sit back and watch as your country turns into a Wasteland but do nothing to stop it, will The Fisher King Syndrome get you? Has it already got you? What do you think?
“No man is an island” as John Donne famously said in 1624 (which also applies to women, of course.) He was an English metaphysical poet and cleric in the Church of England. The work in question was called ‘Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions, and severall steps in my Sicknes’. It covers death, rebirth and the early modern concept of sickness as a visit from God, reflecting internal sinfulness… you could almost call it a kind of personal Fisher King Syndrome.
In the poem, Donne emphasise the idea of our physical world as a whole, in which each human being is connected to all of the others. Rather than being an isolated island, Donne states that every person is a continent connected to the whole, if the continent dies, it will certainly affect the whole in just the same way as an individual death is felt by the immediate relatives of the deceased. He then claims this demonstrates that when the death bell tolls, it not only tolls for the individual, but also for the whole of mankind who are connected to him, because "even private actions have public consequences."
Personally, I would go further by including all the components of our physical world as comprising the connected whole, not just the human beings. We are an integral part of nature, or rather Nature is an integral part of us, and we can’t survive without it. As John Donne also said, “Nature hath no goal, though she hath law.” Trees don’t have an agenda, they’re not ‘out to get us’ and yet mankind’s centuries long persecution of trees constitutes a genuine holocaust. We have all been pre-programmed with the concept that life is one big struggle against ‘The Forces of Nature’, particularly in the guise of ‘extreme weather’. Could it simply be a coincidence that this just happens to coincide with the ‘Climate Change’ agenda, or is nature really wreaking it’s revenge upon us? Today, our climate can be controlled by artificial ‘scientific’ means. Some 20 odd years before John Donne wrote his poem, Dr. John Dee was believed to have conjured the storm that foiled the Spanish Armada’s attempted invasion of England. This event inspired William Shakespeare to write his play ‘The Tempest’. So, in the 16th century the idea that the climate could be controlled by supernatural means was obviously not considered ridiculous. Perhaps this was due to the legacy of the pre-cataclysm Sacred Marriage agreement, whereby The Goddess would orchestrate the appropriate weather at the correct time to ensure a good harvest, unlike today when the exact opposite is true and we get floods during the sowing season, drought during the growing season and heavy rain during the harvest. 99.9% of all the fertility rituals, which were once performed joyfully by local communities, have disappeared over the last few hundred years… could that be a coincidence? Anyone would think that the weather is now being used as a weapon against us and I’m sure there are plenty of dark forces around who are making that possible with help from the silver iodide generators, just like those of the Weather Modification Centre in Morocco that began operating in 1984 after being financed, constructed and implemented by the USA. I’m sure all those who died in last year’s catastrophic floods in Spain's DANA debacle, and in the others that have wreaked so much destruction and death since 1984, would like to thank the USA for that most sincerely.
During the 1960’s, British car makers didn’t use robots on their production lines, they used identical clones instead
f there’s one thing that’s clear from all of those Artificially Incompetent nostalgia videos on YouTube, it’s that the human race has lost all and any sense of community. Now we all live in isolation and they’ve given us Social Media and forums to keep us distracted from the realisation of that loss. Under the pretence of being ‘online communities’ they are really weapons of surveillance, manipulation and control, but almost everyone is hooked because all the real communities have been destroyed. I was born in south London during the 1950’s. I lived in Battersea until I was about 4 years old. Most of my relatives lived there as well, or near abouts. During that time, Battersea was very much a working class neighbourhood, still scarred by damage from the Blitz of WWII.
Battersea 1960's (Source)
During the 60’s and 70’s those in positions of power, who had given themselves Sovereignty over all of the communities in London, began a massive redevelopment program, which was more about the destruction and redistribution of communities and making fat profits from the construction works, rather than being anything positive. They called it ‘social housing’. Once the initial novelty wore off, those who lived in it called it a shit-hole.
Front view of a house occupied by 'Battersea Squatters'; covering the window a sign saying 'We're staying, house the homeless',
Battersea, London, UK, December 1977. (Photo by Evening Standard/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
Joyful, close-knit neighbourhoods were annihilated and dispersed into new, ugly ‘high rise’ blocks that quickly became breeding grounds for violence, vandalism and loneliness.
Concrete Monstrosities (Source)
It didn’t take long until the true motives of those in power became abundantly clear. The high rise blocks were what used to be called ‘Jerry-built’ ("built hastily of shoddy materials," from 1856) and they began to collapse...
(Source)
The original communities died, tempted away by the lure of ‘mod-cons’ (modern conveniences,) such as hot and cold running water, indoor toilets, etc. Such ‘luxuries’ proved transient and paled in comparison to what they had lost in terms of their communal way of life. Older people were discovered in a severely decomposed condition inside their high-rise flats (apartments), having previously died weeks before without anyone noticing. The street I lived in is now unrecognisable, most of it having been torn down. These days, Battersea is one of the most expensive areas of London where now, very few true ‘Londoners’ can afford to buy property. I’m sure the exact same story can be told about most of the UK’s cities. It all comes under the general policy of “Managed Decline,” as Geoffrey Howe, the demoness Margaret Thatcher's longest-serving Cabinet minister, eventually admitted during the 1980’s in his Top Secret memo to the bitch, sorry I mean cow, OK then maniac.
It’s a similar situation to the changes that took place in commerce. Once you sub-divide any kind of enterprise (commercial kingdom) into departments and isolate them from each other, you will usually find that the Finance or Accounts department becomes ‘top-dog’. When I first started in IT, I was answerable to the Finance Director, who knew very little about IT apart from spreadsheets. This Finance Director had "power of control, right of uncontrolled possession, use, and disposal" over my services. The Finance Director allocates budgets to all the other departments, even though he has no idea about exactly what it is they do – which doesn’t matter, because it’s all about the numbers, the figures, the turnover, but mainly the profit and loss. Communication and creativity are completely stifled, replaced by internal competition between the departments. The business loses all sense of community and its employees become “just another brick in the wall,” as the song says.
For over more than 1000 years we have been systematically isolated from The Otherworld, from The Goddess and her care for mankind, and her Sovereignty over the forces of nature. We’ve been disconnected from our own true roots and from nature itself. We have been blinded to the Fae races with whom we unknowingly share this physical realm just as we have shared The Otherworld with them before. We have been given an elaborately crafted version of our history that has led us to believe in the human precedent for survival of the fittest, violence, conquest, male domination, racism, cruelty and being sinners who must constantly repent to obtain forgiveness from a god who hates trees.
In the 1960’s, Britain was renowned for its magic flying Milk Floats, which were perfect for the new paradise of high-rise social housing estates.
This innovation was first introduced by Hogwart's Dairy's
The efficiency of this deception can be demonstrated by the disappointing existence of hereditary racism. By this I mean the phenomena whereby those who live in countries that were once victims of colonialism, still blame and despise the existing citizens of the once colonising country. There is one exception to this and that’s the largely fictitious Roman Empire, which we have all been indoctrinated to believe was somehow responsible for giving the world the gift of ‘civilisation’ rather than imperialism and slavery, not to mention Christianity …I said not to mention it!
You may consider this to be simply an excuse, coming from someone whose native and adopted country’s were amongst the greatest offenders. However, as an after effect of colonialism, hereditary racism still manages to keep hatred alive even after most of the colonised countries have regained their Sovereignty decades ago. The disappointment arises when those who see themselves as being victims of a colonisation, even today, still blame the normal, ordinary citizens of the once colonising country, as if it was their responsibility, despite the fact it happened long before anyone alive today was born. Logic alone dictates that this is ridiculous, but there’s more to it than that. The act of colonisation doesn’t simply involve a whole bunch of people from one country walking in to another country and taking over, despite what the King of Morocco may think. All colonisations were born of greed, driven by economic factors, orchestrated by merchants, financed by a whole wunch of bankers and carried out by thugs commanding normal people. Circumstance (or a Press Gang,) had forced these individuals into uniforms where they found themselves serving as soldiers. For many it was because there was no other means of earning a living open to them, and for others because it was their punishment for some petty crime or other. These people were just as much victims as those who were colonised, ask yourself what did they gain from any of it?
It’s the same the whole world over,
It’s the poor what gets the blame,
It’s the rich what gets the pleasure,
Ain’t it all a feckin' shame.”
..as the late 19th century English folk song says. Anyway, it’s attitudes like hereditary racism that keep humanity divided and people isolated, so all the indoctrination has worked a treat and the initial colonisation is still is doing its damage, even though it ended decades ago. We don’t need that on top of everything else, we need people to see beyond it and to create a society where colonisation never happens again.
Before leaving the subject of colonisation, I would like to mention something about South America. I am very fortunate to have had the privilege of knowing someone quite remarkable, who is from Mexico, for a few years now. She was a member of the resurrected stolenhistory.net forum and has been a loyal and valued supporter of this website since its conception. I have referenced the abundance of supernatural activity in South America many times in my articles and I have often wondered what’s so special about that area. Well, my Mexican friend unwittingly gave me the likely answer herself. Her paternal grandmother possessed the ability to stop storms and prevent lightning from harming humans, and she herself had telekinetic abilities as a baby, which enabled her to move toys around without touching them. In Europe it’s a very different story. I’m sure many Europeans also had grandmothers with similar abilities, but in general, they would all have been burned at the stake back in the 15th century during the witch-hunt persecutions. Whilst it’s still possible to find accounts of weather spells being sold in Wales during the 18th century, in general any paranormal abilities were vigorously persecuted in Europe, so those that still possessed them wouldn’t advertise the fact and they would be understandably reluctant to pass them on to their descendants.
In South America the story is different. Colonisation didn’t get underway until the 16th century and the Christianisation process was much slower than it had been in Europe due to the terrain and the sheer size of the country. So, it isn’t really surprising to find that an indigenous person living in Mexico today has a relative with paranormal abilities in their family’s previous generation, and I’m sure that situation is the same across all of the South American countries.
The main point I am trying to make in this article is that nothing happens in isolation, except the passage of time and decay. When King Arthur underwent the Sacred Marriage ceremony he became the Sovereign Protector of The Goddess, The Kingdom and The Land, along with all that it implies as previously stated. BUT, and it’s the most important but I have ever butted, he did not own the Kingdom, he did not own The Land or anything upon it, he was simply the custodian of everything that comprised the Kingdom. This Is the single most important fact that has been overlooked, and indeed hidden, for over 1000 years.
Let’s take this to the opposite extreme. Imagine a family living in Arthur’s Kingdom who are part of a small rural community. The concept of ownership of the land that the father works, just doesn’t exist in anyone’s head. The land belongs to The Goddess and the community are caring for it on her behalf, and in return, she ensures abundance and takes care of the community. Within that community there are various Fae and Elementals who have their own specific responsibilities related to the well-being of the environment. There is no competition for the ownership of land. The King does not own all the deer in the forests and nobody hunts for sport. The community is one massive integration, a web that extends to humans, Fae, Elementals, animals, the seasons and even the flora and fauna.
I know if you are sitting there reading this in 2026, then you will find the above ridiculous. I can understand that. It sounds like a Fairy Tale. Not only has all of this been lost, it’s been thoroughly expunged and replaced with notions of child-like fantasy, or mental disorder. The issue is not whether this scenario was real or not (which is unresolvable,) but how can we recreate and reconnect to it? If you’re expecting an answer to that then I’m afraid I may not be the right man for the job. I can make some suggestions though.
As with everything, it all begins with desire – you have to want it. Then you need the will to achieve it. I think it’s highly beneficial to try and switch your mindset away from the concept of individual ownership and its prerogatives, towards communal custodianship. I don’t mean that you should share your car with your neighbours, or become a communist, but simply to realise that the land you have claimed as your own already belongs to Nature, to The Goddess, the trees, the birds, rivers, lakes and streams, the Elementals and the Fae – to an entire existing community that you need to become a part of, engage with and learn to respect. If that means becoming child-like, then so be it. When you were a small child, you were still fresh from The Otherworld, with your life’s mission echoing in your ears. Back then you could feel that community all around you and connect to the web. Until it was all educated out of you.
“Birds of a feather, flock together,” so it would be nice to think that once you have successfully made that connection to Nature via the Web of Wyrd, you will automatically attract like-minded people to you, or you will be attracted to them. Well, it hasn’t happened to me yet, but I’ll keep my fingers crossed for you.
In order to write this article, I broke off the research I was doing for another one. This one was supposed to be quick, but as usual, I’m still here waffling on. The other article concerns non-human reincarnation ...or rebirth – there seems to be some confusion as to whether they are the same thing or different. My premise for the article is to discuss the evidence for non-human reincarnation as being the key to offering an explanation for ‘inherited’ characteristics. In other words, can our personalities and predilections be explained purely by genetics or could they come from a previous non-human existence?
To quote an old 1971 song by the band Sly and the Family Stone, (Family Affair,)
“One child grows up to be somebody that just loves to learn,
And another child grows up to be somebody you’d just love to burn.”
However, it all falls down a few lines later…
“Mom loves the both of them,
You see, it's in the blood,
Both kids are good to mom,
Blood's thicker than the mud.”
I don’t believe you can explain those kinds of situations with genetics alone. Who or what you were in a previous existence (on this plane or another) must have a far stronger influence than any physically inherited characteristics – in my opinion. This falls in line with the popular and ancient concept that the Agendas we are facing on the Earth Plane have their origins elsewhere, and those who promote these Agendas here, do so because they were previously a part of them elsewhere.
Anyway, I won’t go on about it now otherwise I’ll never get this, or the next one, published on the website. So I’ll love you and leave you for now.
Will Scarlet
&autoplay=1&loop=1
.
IF YOU ARE SEEING A LINK TO MOBIRISE, OR SOME NONSENSE ABOUT A FREE AI WEBSITE BUILDER, THEN IT IS A FRAUDULENT INSERTION BY THE PROVIDERS OF THE SUPPOSEDLY 'FREE' WEBSITE SOFTWARE USED TO CREATE THIS SITE. THEY ARE USING MY WEBHOSTING PLATFORM FOR THEIR OWN ADVERTISING PURPOSES WITHOUT MY CONSENT. TO REMOVE THESE LINKS I WOULD HAVE TO PAY A YEARLY FEE TO MOBIRISE ON TOP OF MY NORMAL WEBHOSTING EXPENSES - WHICH IS TANTAMOUNT TO BLACKMAIL. I CALCULATE THAT THEY CURRENTLY OWE ME THREE MILLION DOLLARS IN ADVERTISING REVENUE AND WEBSITE RENTAL.